The typical strain theories delineated that crime takes place as a result of the strike to reach financial desires through legal ways. Mazerolle (2000, pp 91-95) disagreed that financial desires were ethnically authorized for all in American culture1. However, that communally organized class distinction restricted the convenience of lawful possibilities to attain these desires or individual freedoms. Individuals in subordinate class positions were said to be more likely to practice strain cleared as aggravation which provoked persons to seek substitute means to attain these desires, as well as unlawful means.
While strain theory offered to motivate research, it commonly formed frail consequences. Conflict in much of this work was considered as the inconsistency between professional or instructive ambitions and prospect for success in these fields. The conclusion from this research commonly demonstrated that criminal behavior was most probable when both desires and prospects were low results which leaned to suggest support reliable with control theory. Research using substitute procedures of conflict, such as professed blocked possibilities or the disjunction between financial desires and instructive means were more helpful of the viewpoint; however results were destabilized when opposing theories were integrated in the study on desire and crime of young people.2 Utilized as procedures of entrance to triumph through legal means, or the attainment of victory, these varied results provided additional proof to send away the typical strain perception.
While making laws to control the crimes in a society, people face a conflict between their desire to retain individual freedoms and their desire to ensure people’s safety. The issue is that more laws for the actions of the people will be made to lessen crimes, on the same time the more individual freedom will be retained. I would suggest that severe laws should me made for serious criminal actions so that the people would not consider breaking the laws. They should be portrayed as a symbol to others. It will facilitate the government not to make any restrictions on small wrong actions.
Past study on desire and crime had also been censured for relying greatly on professed life prospects deteriorating to integrate objective probabilities and life situations. Thus, researchers failed to discover communications that integrated people’s place in the stratification process and their desires.3 Conflict may also improve when people have high financial desires and feel comparatively disadvantaged and are financially displeased. In one of the few efforts to integrate both financial desires and measures of fiscal accomplishment, Hannon (2003. pp 427-432) found numerous of these communications were important predictors of crime, but only for Whites4. No work, although, had observed how comparative deprivation circumstances the direct result of financial desires on crime.
- Mazerolle P., Burton V.S. Jr., Cullen F.T., Evans T.D. and Payne G.L., Strain, anger, and delinquency adaptations: Specifying general strain theory, Journal of Criminal Justice 28 (2000), pp. 89–101.
- Dye R. Thomas, Understanding Public Policy (11th Edition), Public Policy Analysis, POL337.
- Hannon L. and Knapp P., Reassessing nonlinearity in the urban disadvantage/violent crime relationship: An example of methodological bias from log transformation, Criminology 41 (2003), pp. 1427–1448.